JJR512
Active Member
I was out driving today (1998 V6 LX Coupe) and started having some transmission problems. I've heard the transmissions in these cars aren't particularly robust, but I hope it's something simple...
When accelerating, the engine would first rev up without imparting any motion, as if a clutch pedal was being held in. Then the car would smoothly start to accelerate, as if a clutch pedal were gently being let out.
When coming to a stop, the car would stay in gear until the engine dipped below idle and started to bog. Then, right before it would have stalled, the transmission would come out of gear. It just waited too long before coming out of gear, basically.
I parked the car for a bit then tried to drive it again. This time, the car did not move at all, no matter which forward gear I selected (I did not think to try reverse). The transmission was acting like it was in neutral. Except...if I revved the engine up high, the car would start to creep forward, but just barely. I got the car to move like this about 50 feet, then it stalled when I took my foot off the accelerator.
I did not check the fluid at the time because...and I'm embarrassed to admit this...I could not quickly find the dipstick. I looked for all of maybe five seconds and didn't see anything obvious so I just assumed that there was none, like many other cars. But now I'm home and I have my Haynes book and I see there is one. Could low fluid level be causing all this? I can't check right now because it's parked about 45 minutes from where I live, but I'll go check tomorrow.
If the fluid is low, must I add it through the plug hole? The Haynes book says transmission in the V6 models must be topped off through a plug hole, while the I4 models can be topped off through the dipstick tube. Why can't the V6 models be topped off that way, which sounds simpler?
If the transmission fluid is very low, will the transmission itself have become damaged because of that? If I need to replace the transmission, how much will that cost? Is rebuilding it a cheaper option, or more expensive?
When accelerating, the engine would first rev up without imparting any motion, as if a clutch pedal was being held in. Then the car would smoothly start to accelerate, as if a clutch pedal were gently being let out.
When coming to a stop, the car would stay in gear until the engine dipped below idle and started to bog. Then, right before it would have stalled, the transmission would come out of gear. It just waited too long before coming out of gear, basically.
I parked the car for a bit then tried to drive it again. This time, the car did not move at all, no matter which forward gear I selected (I did not think to try reverse). The transmission was acting like it was in neutral. Except...if I revved the engine up high, the car would start to creep forward, but just barely. I got the car to move like this about 50 feet, then it stalled when I took my foot off the accelerator.
I did not check the fluid at the time because...and I'm embarrassed to admit this...I could not quickly find the dipstick. I looked for all of maybe five seconds and didn't see anything obvious so I just assumed that there was none, like many other cars. But now I'm home and I have my Haynes book and I see there is one. Could low fluid level be causing all this? I can't check right now because it's parked about 45 minutes from where I live, but I'll go check tomorrow.
If the fluid is low, must I add it through the plug hole? The Haynes book says transmission in the V6 models must be topped off through a plug hole, while the I4 models can be topped off through the dipstick tube. Why can't the V6 models be topped off that way, which sounds simpler?
If the transmission fluid is very low, will the transmission itself have become damaged because of that? If I need to replace the transmission, how much will that cost? Is rebuilding it a cheaper option, or more expensive?