TitaniumACC
Well-Known Member
well...dynotested yesterday..quite deceiving...
I'll explain myself: the dyno calculated a 30% loss of hp at the wheels. Normally a % loss is about 15% on a manual transmission, but the technician said it's normal to have 30% loss on a MAHA dyno. So here's the numbers:
194.4hp at the flywheel
139.5 whp
158.8 tq at the flywheel
123.4 wtq
If i calculate a 30% loss on a stock H22 (200hp), it gives 170whp, so i don't bother with this dyno sheet. I'll prolly try another one soon, but i'm thinking to try another JDM headers and buy an AEM CAI but made for H22, not my F23's one.
Also, what helps me to forget about this dyno run, was that dyno tested a 2005 Mustang GT and here's number: 283hp at flywheel and 227whp. Understand now that there's no way my car have 140whp... and there no way a big 6th gen with 140whp can race under 15.3 on 1/4 too...
I'll explain myself: the dyno calculated a 30% loss of hp at the wheels. Normally a % loss is about 15% on a manual transmission, but the technician said it's normal to have 30% loss on a MAHA dyno. So here's the numbers:
194.4hp at the flywheel
139.5 whp
158.8 tq at the flywheel
123.4 wtq
If i calculate a 30% loss on a stock H22 (200hp), it gives 170whp, so i don't bother with this dyno sheet. I'll prolly try another one soon, but i'm thinking to try another JDM headers and buy an AEM CAI but made for H22, not my F23's one.
Also, what helps me to forget about this dyno run, was that dyno tested a 2005 Mustang GT and here's number: 283hp at flywheel and 227whp. Understand now that there's no way my car have 140whp... and there no way a big 6th gen with 140whp can race under 15.3 on 1/4 too...