Ok first off, sorry for the dirty engine bay and shadows on these shots - the sun was at a bad angle.
Second, I didn't make the DIY catch can - I bought one, but I just hooked it up today.
You can see how I ran the hoses - PCV --> Can (near CAI) --> IM.
The catch can intake and corresponding hose is lower than the PCV valve, but catch can outlet and corresponding hose is higher than IM inlet. This doesn't matter really in my case, because I just need vacuum - no oil will go to IM anyways due to distance of can.
Next I explored the hoses again. Mainly the hose that comes off CAI --> left valve cover hole. My theory was correct! There is no way that oil is coming out of that hole
ever due to a strong vacuum being pulled
into the left valve cover hole.
Conversely, the PCV (center) hole on the valve cover has pressure pushing out of it (air, oil, gasses, etc).
In conclusion, I think that connecting both of those holes and running them to IM is an incorrect way to hook it up, because left hole
draws air (vacuum) as opposed to center hole pushing air out (hence functionality of catch can).
The left hole is hooked up to an intake source to draw in clean air. If you hook it up with recirculated air/oil/gasses, it hinder functionality of it's original intent.
You also have to understand, that I drove over 700 miles with this setup, and barely had 1/8" of oil accumulate in the catch can.
This I think may be due to recirculation of oil coming out of center hole and going in through left hole, due to the vacuum. Furthermore, this could be the case because the IM line is at a 90 degree angle to both of the other lines, which are straight towards each other. The IM line and left hole line are both fighting for suction from the PVC center hole, and left hole is winning due to the angle.
AFAccord, would you agree with what I'm saying? It sounded like a good idea to hook it up like you did at first, but after looking at it I don't know if that's the correct way. What do you think bro?