CrosCntryAccord
Well-Known Member
yeah, evo>wrx by a mile. congrats on getting a new car, not my choice of color or style but if its what you like enjoy it
that's like saying an STi would smoke a lancer. haha pretty sure it will..plus subaru has better overall build quality. more reliable than mitsubishi.Pretty sure an Evolution 10 would spank the WRX stock for stock.......if it was an STi it would be another story....
congrats on a new ride, what are your future plans for it? you gonna drop it?
that's like saying an STi would smoke a lancer. haha pretty sure it will..plus subaru has better overall build quality. more reliable than mitsubishi.
STI Numbers
Curb weight est 3300 lb
Wheelbase 103.1 in.
Displacement 2457 cc
Horsepower est 320 bhp @ 6000 rpm
Torque 320 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Performance
0–60 mph est 4.5 sec
0–1320 ft (¼ mile) est 12.5 sec
Evo X Numbers:
Price est $32,000
Curb weight est 3500 lb
Displacement 1998 cc
Horsepower est 300 bhp @ 7000 rpm
Torque 325 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm
Transmission 6-speed semiautomatic
Chassis & Body
Brakes, f&r vented discs, ABS
Wheels forged alloy, 18 in.
Tires Bridgestone Potenza, 245/40R-18
Performance
0–60 mph est 4.5 sec
0–1320 ft (¼ mile) est 12.5 sec
practically identical cars. Mitsu turbo engine has come a long way when it comes to bulding engines from back in the DSM disaster days, so what makes you so confident that the build quality is better for one car or another
oh boy...i said LANCER not EVO...irrevelant conversation.I was using the R&T numbers because the article was the most objective. Most of the numbers were estimated but it proves my point that both cars are very closely matched. Which in turn invalidates your point about how a STI would smoke a lancer.
show me objective proof that the lancer has a lower build quality than a STI and i'll
great pick up
oh boy...i said LANCER not EVO...irrevelant conversation.
thanks. it was worth the wait.