Accord_V6_400m
Well-Known Member
Interesting points, I would argue with Egi7 that the extra volume does help, ever hear about helmholtz principle and the use of resonance to aid induction? Why else do you think so many cars, and especially Hondas have variable IM's? To try and get a good balance of power during different points in the powerband, of course. There are cases such as the RSX-S and Civic Si (K20A2) where the manifolds are not variable and just large volume period.
In this manner a manifold spacer/TB spacer would be adding volume, thus theoretically power gains, but as most will notice these gains in volume are not huge by any means.
Take a look at the plenum chambers available for the J32A2, They add bigger end tanks for the IM to increase volume, and these showed excellent gains throughout the powerband , but we have more evidence of this for hgher rpm operation vs lower, I would think that it might hurt lower rpm operation but we'll have to wait on a better dyno that lets say goes in 5th gear from 45-50mph.
Product:
http://cl.acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=191848
Gains:
http://cl.acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=192574
counterpoint:
http://cl.acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2731876&posted=1#post2731876
Although i agree that in terms of fuel atomization that spacers on modern fuel injected motors do nothing. One has to ask how long the air will stay swirling if it begins right after the TB and by the time it reaches the en of the lower plenum runners where the fuel injectors sit.
Fuel atomization does give you better fuel economy if you tune for it, it allows you to use less fuel. Just check out the VTEC-E operation and those lean running JDM motors (45:1 and 60:1 AFR's) Although the latter does not have as much to do with atomization but more a lack there of since it relies on a dense AF charge to be sparked in the center of the piston where a dish is located and then the whole concept works during crusie operation.
In this manner a manifold spacer/TB spacer would be adding volume, thus theoretically power gains, but as most will notice these gains in volume are not huge by any means.
Take a look at the plenum chambers available for the J32A2, They add bigger end tanks for the IM to increase volume, and these showed excellent gains throughout the powerband , but we have more evidence of this for hgher rpm operation vs lower, I would think that it might hurt lower rpm operation but we'll have to wait on a better dyno that lets say goes in 5th gear from 45-50mph.
Product:
http://cl.acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=191848
Gains:
http://cl.acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=192574
counterpoint:
http://cl.acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2731876&posted=1#post2731876
Although i agree that in terms of fuel atomization that spacers on modern fuel injected motors do nothing. One has to ask how long the air will stay swirling if it begins right after the TB and by the time it reaches the en of the lower plenum runners where the fuel injectors sit.
Fuel atomization does give you better fuel economy if you tune for it, it allows you to use less fuel. Just check out the VTEC-E operation and those lean running JDM motors (45:1 and 60:1 AFR's) Although the latter does not have as much to do with atomization but more a lack there of since it relies on a dense AF charge to be sparked in the center of the piston where a dish is located and then the whole concept works during crusie operation.