Photography Shoutbox

hiddengamer7

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2007
Posts
4,611
Reaction score
9
Location
farmville
Dude, that focal length shines on full frame, my 24-70 is so lackluster on a crop but on my 5D its so perfect.
 

xluben

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Posts
1,299
Reaction score
5
Location
MN
The 18-55 IS is better than the 28-135 IS?
Better? Maybe not. Better value? Definitely.

The 28mm wide end is a complete waste on a crop (IMO). And it costs 3x as much for lower image quality. IS and USM and added reach are nice, but if you want a general purpose lens that is sharp, I'd save my money and get the 18-55 IS.

Why do you think I'm asking about the 17-85 and there just happens to be one on CL? :deal: :lawl:

I e-mailed the guy a few hours ago... no reply yet.
:)
 

finch13

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2008
Posts
5,025
Reaction score
41
Location
Twin Cities, MN
Better? Maybe not. Better value? Definitely.

The 28mm wide end is a complete waste on a crop (IMO). And it costs 3x as much for lower image quality. IS and USM and added reach are nice, but if you want a general purpose lens that is sharp, I'd save my money and get the 18-55 IS.


:)


28 on a crop IS useless. My tammy 28-300 sucks all around and I get tired of shooting the nifty all the time.

I'm going to pick up that lens in dinkytown at 11!
 
Back
Top