The best car in the world is on sale.

[RedRyder]

Are those factory wheels chrome on that thing? I would repaint those with a quickness. Other than that, I dig it.

 

[Frisky Arab]

Are those factory wheels chrome on that thing? I would repaint those with a quickness. Other than that, I dig it.

Yeah those are factory wheels. Usually you don't find them in that shiny of condition considering the cars age. I would get new wheels, but I would always keep the originals around. As time goes on it gets cooler and cooler to have a 100% original classic.

 

[Frisky Arab]

Are those factory wheels chrome on that thing? I would repaint those with a quickness. Other than that, I dig it.

Yeah those are factory wheels. Usually you don't find them in that shiny of condition considering the cars age. I would get new wheels, but I would always keep the originals around. As time goes on it gets cooler and cooler to have a 100% original classic.

 

[CrosCntryAccord]

Woah when did i say that?

right here

Stock N/A Supra's still go for around 15-20k and boosted for about 25-30k here in California. For its immaculate condition and aftermarket parts it's not that expensive. So you would seriously take an nsx over a supra? Really? I take it your a Honda Ridgeline fan as well

 

[RedRyder]

Yeah those are factory wheels. Usually you don't find them in that shiny of condition considering the cars age. I would get new wheels, but I would always keep the originals around. As time goes on it gets cooler and cooler to have a 100% original classic.

I know they’re factory wheels, just have never seen them in chrome before. Usually see them in the factory silver only.

Probably right though, good idea to keep the originals. I'd pick up a set of RZ wheels for the winter or something. And rock some fatty deep dishes for summer.

 

[slowrider87]

in 2012 the only car toyota makes that costs over 52k is the sequoia and land cruiser, both large SUV's brand new, i wouldn't paying 52k for a 1993 toyota anything regardless of rarity and aftermarket parts or not. would love to own it, but not with that price tag.

 

[FunnyVictor86]

right here

First, your a little late to the party lol. Second, you should read a little more carefully. I mentioned the cost of N/A Supras and F/I Supras in Southern California. Nowhere did I state that a N/A Supra is better than an NSX. In fact I'm don't ever recall ever comparing them in specifics of any kind. The only statement I made was of my own preference which was that I would take a Supra over an NSX any day.

 

[Frisky Arab]

in 2012 the only car toyota makes that costs over 52k is the sequoia and land cruiser, both large SUV's brand new, i wouldn't paying 52k for a 1993 toyota anything regardless of rarity and aftermarket parts or not. would love to own it, but not with that price tag.

Agreed. Doesn't really make sense that they want to sell a 560hp supra for 52k when poeple are selling them with over 800hp for like 40k. Like I said though, I would much rather pay the 25k for a bone stock 6-speed TT then anything else.

All critisism aside though, the one in the original post was pretty sexy though.

 

[CrosCntryAccord]

First, your a little late to the party lol. Second, you should read a little more carefully. I mentioned the cost of N/A Supras and F/I Supras in Southern California. Nowhere did I state that a N/A Supra is better than an NSX. In fact I'm don't ever recall ever comparing them in specifics of any kind. The only statement I made was of my own preference which was that I would take a Supra over an NSX any day.

I'm glad you would take a supra, I'd rather keep the NSX with people who appreciate a balanced car and don't want something that is built to go fast in a straight line only.

 

[Dolebag]

No doubts that this car is amazing, but I gotta say it's just not worth the pricetag. So many other amazing cars you could have for a quarter of the price.