too low? lol

[Forte EXE]

That's perfect! That's how low i had my car for about a week. It wasnt too bad you just gotta be patient. And it's definately practical. You gotta pay to play.

 

[F23AJDM]

damn that is LOW. looks sick though

 

[hirichard]

oh my

 

[1320performance]

That's perfect! That's how low i had my car for about a week. It wasnt too bad you just gotta be patient. And it's definately practical. You gotta pay to play.

very true. btw the rear can go another 1.5 -1.8 inch lower front can go 2+ inch lower but have to get the subframe redone to go that low.

 

[CrosCntryAccord]

the only "pay to play" is in the price you'll be paying when your **** gets torn up

back to my original question, how are the UCA's treating the shock tower?

 

[SykVSyx]

I don't think Moleman even dropped his that low, and that is about the lowest, driveable Accord I've seen, not bagged.

I think to have the subframe on the ground is a bit much, the outward appearance of the car looks great, but once you get underneath, kind of takes away from the quality of the overall ride.

 

[1320performance]

the only "pay to play" is in the price you'll be paying when your **** gets torn up

back to my original question, how are the UCA's treating the shock tower?

UCA never touch the shock tower never bottom out. function and form suspension spring preload never change only the height changes if you are ridding on some cheap *** suspension u will mess up the UCA and put a hole in your shock tower.

 

[CrosCntryAccord]

its that low and it never touches the shock tower...... riiiiiiiiiiight


i've ridden in F2's that were that low, it hit the tower plenty, since there is next to zero play

 

[1320performance]

dude check your damping and your preload thats the key to set up your suspension. the UCA never touch the shock tower i will bet you money on it.

 

[kurtage77]

no such thing! haha
that's pretty sick