JMillerUA6
Grillin' rape steaks
If this **** is true I'll send my ECU off TOMORROW!!
But...........................I smell BS.
But...........................I smell BS.
The purpose of citing the Dyno was to show how unbelievable it is.
no vtec crossover?
...no vtec crossover
First of all, the dyno plot of a 98-02 Accord 4 cyl doesn't look like that. My dyno graph looks nothing like that. Despite the fact that I was 5 speed doesn't make a difference.
Will the JET ECU reprogram give you gains? Most likely, yes, given they change the fuel maps and advance the timing, but not to the extent of the website dyno
/rant.
Jason your track times suck! :leeann: Lol jp.I see no VTEC crossover here...
I can't say whether it was the ECU, or possibly a solid motor that made those numbers, but I know the numbers are good. If you don't agree, then try arguing with my track times.
I see no VTEC crossover here...
Jason your track times suck! :leeann: Lol jp.
Our dyno's look drastically different, which is strange. Mine actually looks like there is a VTEC crossover right around 4k RPM. However, the TQ at 4k RPM drops while the HP increases..Is there usually a drop in torque when VTEC "kicks in?"
Sonnick said:I know there isn't a true VTEC "punch" with the F23 motor, but why the jump The AFR drops a lot at about 4300 RPM, but certainly after the so-called "crossover."
It cuz ur low on vtec fluid.