i agree, calm down Hlover
back to topic since i have yet to respond. nos is good in some aspects. initially cheap, easy to install, great power to cost ratio.
yet in a race, point to point, 5 mile, turbo would ultimatly prevail due to the lack of nos out of a 10 bottle. when the nos runs out, he still has 189 whp which is good, just not as good as a turbo's 250+
in the hands of ppl who know how to use nos, wet & fogger, it is great to have.
turbo is good, cost a **** load more and u must know a lot to do it. the reward is great out of it.
N/a IS THE BEST WAY. it cost the most, but the power is there all the time without lag or running out of spray. there is little to no loss of torque with a good n/a build. i was in a turbo'd accord(275whp) that lost to another cb7 n/a (220whp).
MOney.... the root of all evil. without money, your car would not go anywhere. i work 2 jobs, i go to school and it will still take me a good little bit to do a turbo build. BUT... i would do a NA build if i had the right engine. f series = bad engine / sohc = sucks.
now to Hlover = If u go cheap early, youll pay for it later. even with demons build. nos needs to be refilled which is a lot of money over time. over the same period of time, both Turbo and nos would cost the same.
so... we need to understand something.
My car will be faster than all of yalls when its done..... BUHAHAHAHAHA!!!!